[MITgcm-support] How to simulate the geostrophic current?

miaocb miaocb at ouc.edu.cn
Fri Mar 18 04:32:50 EDT 2011


 Hi Jody,
   Thank for your comments. I initialized the velocity field by using the geostrophic relationship. But the velocity drifted away from the initial value. And I still can not get the right answer.
The horizontal resolution is 2000m in my configuration. Please tell me the trick if you work it out. Thanks.

Paul 
   
>From: Klymak Jody <jklymak at uvic.ca>
>To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] How to simulate the geostrophic current?
>Message-ID: <BAAF5130-5337-4A9F-8729-122405E0242E at uvic.ca>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>Given your reply to Martin, your approach looks good to me, though I've not tried this set up before.   
>
>If I were doing a tidal simulation I would set tauRelaxT quite a bit longer than a tidal period, or you will damp your waves.
>
>You don't seem to specify a uVelInitFile or vVelInitFile under PARM05.  I would do so, otherwise your response will be dominated by geostrophic adjustment for many inertial periods >and will take a long time to spin up to steady state.  You will keep trying to relax to a condition that is *not* geostrophically consistent with your initial conditions.  
>
>Finally, I am not sure what viscAh you should be using, because you don't really specify your horizontal resolution.  But for high-resolution internal tide runs I just use 1e-4, and the >model runs fine.  
>
>Anyway, I expect you didn't initialize the velocity, and that is why your model is behaving funny, and also why a short relaxation timescale seems desirable.  
>
>Hope that is of some help.
>
>Cheers,    Jody





More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list