[Mitgcm-support] Re: initialise_fixed

mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org
Wed Jul 9 15:32:22 EDT 2003


OK with me.
-Patrick

Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In initialise_fixed :
> I'am going to move INI_LINEAR_PHISURF and INI_CORI
> after the packages initialisation (boot+readpar+fixed).
> advantages: 
> 1) I prefer.
> 2) we will have the same sequence of calls at the end of 
>    initialise_fixed and at the beginning of initialise_varia:
>    INI_LINEAR_PHISURF, INI_CORI, INI_CG2D, INI_CG3D
> 3) and if it works like this, we can (later) keep those calls only 
>    in initialise_varia (since they have to be there for TAF).
> 
> Is it OK for you Patrick ?
> 
> Jean-Michel


-- 
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Patrick Heimbach     Massachusetts Institute of Technology
FON: +1/617/253-5259                    EAPS, Room 54-1518
FAX: +1/617/253-4464               77 Massachusetts Avenue
mailto:heimbach at mit.edu                 Cambridge MA 02139
http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/                       U.S.A.




More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list