[Mitgcm-support] Re: initialise_fixed
mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org
mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org
Wed Jul 9 15:32:22 EDT 2003
OK with me.
-Patrick
Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In initialise_fixed :
> I'am going to move INI_LINEAR_PHISURF and INI_CORI
> after the packages initialisation (boot+readpar+fixed).
> advantages:
> 1) I prefer.
> 2) we will have the same sequence of calls at the end of
> initialise_fixed and at the beginning of initialise_varia:
> INI_LINEAR_PHISURF, INI_CORI, INI_CG2D, INI_CG3D
> 3) and if it works like this, we can (later) keep those calls only
> in initialise_varia (since they have to be there for TAF).
>
> Is it OK for you Patrick ?
>
> Jean-Michel
--
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Patrick Heimbach Massachusetts Institute of Technology
FON: +1/617/253-5259 EAPS, Room 54-1518
FAX: +1/617/253-4464 77 Massachusetts Avenue
mailto:heimbach at mit.edu Cambridge MA 02139
http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/ U.S.A.
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list