[MITgcm-devel] units for empmr in diagnostics

[Martin Losch]

The fields are not exactly the same, as the oceFWflx contains  
contributions of stuff that's being called after seaice_model, e.g.,  
my terrible balance fluxes stuff. The same is (probably) true for  
oceQnet/SIqnet and oceQsw/SIqsw?

Still, we probably don't need the SI-variants, except for debugging  
purposes?

Martin

On 6 Dec 2007, at 02:17, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:

> Jean-Michel, I have not checked recently but some time I made  
> myself the following note:
>
> C     pkg/diagnostics SIempmr, dumpfreq EmPmR, and tavefreq EmPmRtave
> C     are identical but they differ from pkg/diagnostics EXFempmr,  
> which
> C     is EmPmR before impact of ice.
>
> So I guess that SIempmr is identical to oceFWflx except for sign?  D.
>
>
>> (not directly related to this: do we need 2 diagnostics, "oceFWflx"
>> and "SIempmr", for what appears to me as the same thing ? or may be I
>> missed a subtil difference ?)
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel