[MITgcm-devel] changing some diagnostics names

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

JM, thanks for taking care of this.  I prefer all your 1rst choices below.

> oceTAUX, oceTAUY        <- replace TAUX,TAUY
> oceQnet (or oceQNET)    new, Qnet diagnostics
> oceQsw  (or oceQSW)     <- replace SWFLUX
> oceFWflx (or oceEmPmR)  new, EmPmR diagnostics
>         (prefer the 1rst one since melting/freezing contribution is included)
> oceSflux (or SaltFlux)  new, saltFlux diagnostics
>         (prefer the 1rst one, consistent with the others diags.)

To make sure that I understand:

1) oceQnet is surfaceForcingT rescaled?  Is it or is it not identical to TFLUX?

2) oceSflux is exactly what SFLUX was prior to 7 nov 06?

3) surfaceForcingS is the "sum" of oceFWflx and oceSflux, where oceSflux 
includes SRELAX and also virtual salt fluxes when model is driven with virtual 
salt fluxes?

>   79 |PRESSURE| 15 |SM      MR      |m               |Cell-Center Height
> that I would rather change to the isomorphic name "RCENTER" (similar
> to RSURF),

OK.

>   75 |TICE    |  1 |SM      U1      |W/m2           |heat from melt/freeze
>                                                       of sea-ice, >0 increases theta
> that I found confusing since we have several Tice variables in the code
> (for sea-ice temperature) and some Tice output files.
> I propose instead a name like FREEZING or QFREEZE (or something else ?)
> since this is non zero only when allowFreezing is true.

oceFreez  ?