[MITgcm-devel] another bug in growth.F ?
Dimitris Menemenlis
menemenlis at sbcglobal.net
Mon Nov 6 12:59:08 EST 2006
Jinlun, thank you for confirmation.
Patrick, Martin, and Jean-Michel, this will break lab-sea experiment ... and
possibly the adjoint, but these are bug fixes so they are urgent. Can I go
ahead and submit, along with Martin and Jinlun's changes for HSNOW treatment?
A version of the modified growth.F that I would check in is here:
http://mitgcm.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/MITgcm_contrib/high_res_cube/code-mods/growth.F
Dimitris
> Dimitris, go ahead removing it from 1 and 2. Jinlun
>
> Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
>
>> Jinlun, thanks for getting back. Can the A22 (0.15) minimum be removed
>> from all computations in growth.F and groatb.F? There are three places
>> that are affected by A22:
>>
>> 1. Computation of hsnow, precip, and evap in growth.F. It definitely needs
>> to be removed from there as this introduces an artificial forcing bias in
>> the solution, even over fully-open-water regions.
>>
>> 2. Computation of GAREA in growth.F. I think that it should be removed
>> from there too but am not 100% sure.
>>
>> 3. Computation of ice thickness HICE in groatb.F. Removing it from there
>> would cause code to blow up since AREA(I,J,2,bi,bj) is in the denominator.
>>
>> Should I go ahead and remove from 1 and 2 above but leave as is in 3?
>>
>> Dimitris
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list