[MITgcm-devel] another bug in growth.F ?
Jinlun Zhang
zhang at apl.washington.edu
Mon Nov 6 12:32:22 EST 2006
Dimitris, go ahead removing it from 1 and 2.
Jinlun
Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
> Jinlun, thanks for getting back. Can the A22 (0.15) minimum be
> removed from all computations in growth.F and groatb.F? There are
> three places that are affected by A22:
>
> 1. Computation of hsnow, precip, and evap in growth.F. It definitely
> needs to be removed from there as this introduces an artificial
> forcing bias in the solution, even over fully-open-water regions.
>
> 2. Computation of GAREA in growth.F. I think that it should be
> removed from there too but am not 100% sure.
>
> 3. Computation of ice thickness HICE in groatb.F. Removing it from
> there would cause code to blow up since AREA(I,J,2,bi,bj) is in the
> denominator.
>
> Should I go ahead and remove from 1 and 2 above but leave as is in 3?
>
> Dimitris
>
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list