[MITgcm-devel] MNC observations.

[Ed Hill]

On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 18:58, Chris Hill wrote:
>  OK - so I'm in a make annoying comments mode today, sorry!

>  1. how come ini_mnc_io.F came back into pkg/mnc. I thought we'd agreed to
> leave it in model/src. Alistair is right that this does not really belong in
> the package (unless he's change his mind in which case he's wrong).

At AJA's prompting, I created it in model/src.  Then JMC moved it to
pkg/mnc.  Now, at CNH's behest, I've moved it back to model/src.

Next, I think its PH's turn to wrap it with adjoint-related #ifdef-s.


>  2. I don't see much sign of protex and structured comments in mnc_
> routines. It will be hard to get our contributors to use the comment and
> in-code documentation practices if we don't use them!

OK, I'll protex-ify mnc_* this week.

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Room 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
            Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
email:   eh3 at mit.edu,  ed at eh3.com
URL:     http://web.mit.edu/eh3/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-devel/attachments/20040314/d26957d5/attachment.sig>