[MITgcm-support] 回复: Diagnostic "Um_Advec"

[钱钰坤]

Hi David,


I had a notebook recording many details when I tried to close the momentum budget:
https://github.com/miniufo/GeoApps/blob/master/notebooks/Budget%20in%20MITgcm%20Part%20III%20Eng.ipynb


You may find that um_advec includes Coriolis contribution if CD_scheme is not used.

Best

----------

Yu-Kun Qian

SCSIO, CAS, China







--------------原始邮件--------------
发件人："David Ferreira "<dfer at mit.edu>;
发送时间：2025年4月25日(星期五) 凌晨0:41
收件人："MITgcm-support" <mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org>;
主题：[MITgcm-support] Diagnostic "Um_Advec"
-----------------------------------

   /* Font Definitions */ @font-face 	{font-family:"Cambria Math"; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face 	{font-family:Aptos; 	panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ .qmbox p.MsoNormal, .qmbox li.MsoNormal, .qmbox div.MsoNormal 	{margin:0in; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif; 	mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;} .qmbox .MsoChpDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-ligatures:none;} @page WordSection1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} .qmbox div.WordSection1 	{page:WordSection1;}   
Hi all,
 
 
 
I’m trying to use the diagnostic Um_Advec/ Vm_Advec, and they don’t seem to give what I was expecting. 
 
(Um_dPhiX/Y, Um_Cori/ Vm_Cori, Um_hDis2/ Vm_hDis2 seem fine).
 
 
 
A quick look at mom_vecinv.F where Um_Advec is filled suggests this is not going to work for all options (I think that with NHmetric, Um_Advec is filled with the Coriolis term). In fact, this  diagnostic may only make sense with the mom flux form.
 
So, I wonder if someone has any quick insight in this before I start banging my head against this.
 
 
 
Cheers,
 
David
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20250425/64237f33/attachment.html>