[MITgcm-support] Passive tracer decoupling from convection

Tue Sep 7 23:13:54 EDT 2021

Dear Manfredi,
Thank you for your response. I hosed 1 Sv of freshwater into the North
Atlantic for 1,000 years. The O2 concentration difference between the
1000th and 1st year is shown below. It shows the deoxygenation of the water
previously occupied by the NADW as expected.
[image: image.png]

Again, thanks for the help everyone!

Cheers,
Yuxin

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:48 PM Manfredi Manizza <mmanizza at ucsd.edu> wrote:

> Hi Yuxin,
>
> First of all, I agree with all the suggestions from Christoph.
>
> Furthemore, normally during the experiments of climate change (climate
> warming I mean) you see the tracers distribution changinging
> on a centennial time scale  in the upper/mid ocean because the
> perturbation of climate continues and it also increases with time.
>
> In your case, it seems that you are applying a perturbation for a blink of
> an eye and you expect the system
> to change. The timescale of your climate perturbation is way too short.
> I doubt that the change in advection scheme will do something on a short
> run.
>
> What you use is a cheap set-up to run  as far as computing time is
> concerned
> so you coud/shoud run it for long(er) time with the same
> perturbation (adding fresh water in the NA)
> applied each year (on the order of centuries) and then look at  the
> results as physical and bgc tracer distribution.
>
> Also try to look at other papers that have done some paleo experiments
> relative to ocean oxygenation
> with models and see if you get similar results or which kind of time scale
> they deal with to perturb the 3D tracer distribution.
>
> I hope what I said here helps and makes sense.
>
> Cheers
> Manfredi
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 5:45 PM Yuxin Zhou <yzhou at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>> Dear Christoph,
>> Your suggestions make a lot of sense. Thanks for pointing them out!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Yuxin
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:52 AM Christoph Voelker <
>> christoph.voelker at awi.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Yuxin,
>>>
>>> in both of your setups I would not expect much response in the deep
>>> oxygen. In the first, AMOC recovers probably quickly, so there is not much
>>> reason to change. In the second, ten years is still fairly short, for
>>> changing tracer distributions in the deeper parts of the ocean. The
>>> timescale of ventilation of intermediate waters is on the order of several
>>> decades, in the deep ocean it is centuries to millenia. So I expect yo will
>>> at least have to run 1000 years with continuously changed overtrning to see
>>> some larger effects in the deep North Atlantic. Maybe have a look at the
>>> distribution of CFCs or anthropogenic carbon in the North Atlantic from the
>>> GLODAP data base; then you see observations of how far a signal from the
>>> surface penetrates within the deep Atlantic within a few decades.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Christoph
>>> Am 03.09.21 um 02:45 schrieb Yuxin Zhou:
>>>
>>> Hi Spencer,
>>> Thanks for the reply. I tested out two of your ideas. After hosing for
>>> one year, I first let the AMOC recover for 100 years. Oxygen
>>> basically remained the same. Then I hosed with 5Sv of freshwater for ten
>>> years. AMOC is basically gone at this point:
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>> However, oxygen still didn't change much:
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>> Going forward, I might test out the different advection schemes and
>>> other ptracer parameters to see if that helps. Again, I appreciate your
>>> help.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yuxin
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:29 PM Spencer Jones <spencerjones at tamu.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Yuxin,
>>>> It seems to me that maybe you just didn't run for long enough to see
>>>> any change in the oxygen concentration. From your email it seems like you
>>>> only ran for 1 year. Is that right? I wouldn't expect the oxygen
>>>> concentration to change until several years (maybe even decades) after
>>>> hosing has taken place, and only to change if the reduction in the AMOC
>>>> continues (i.e. you might want to continue hosing, rather than switching it
>>>> off).
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure why tutorial_global_oce_biogeo doesn't match with
>>>> observations, but usually the tutorial experiments are set up to
>>>> demonstrate the model functionality, not to provide a very realistic
>>>> simulation. You might need to put more work into improving the forcing
>>>> fields and/or resolution in order to get realistic output.
>>>> Good luck ,
>>>> Spencer
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:28 PM Yuxin Zhou <yzhou at ldeo.columbia.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> I'm running the tutorial_global_oce_biogeo experiment and analyzing
>>>>> the oxygen results and I found some weird behaviors. Any help would be
>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the AMOC stream function in equilibrium, which looks normal:
>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the AMOC stream function after a hosing of 5 Sv for one year
>>>>> (by increasing precipitation in the 50-70N North Atlantic region), which
>>>>> looks normal too. It shows a weakened NADW:
>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the oxygen concentration of the AMOC cross-section in
>>>>> equilibrium:
>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the oxygen concentration after the hosing:
>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> Firstly, the oxygen concentration of the AMOC in equilibrium does not
>>>>> reflect modern observations such as the World Ocean Atlas, which shows
>>>>> oxygenated water closely following the presence of the NADW. Secondly,
>>>>> oxygen basically doesn't change even though circulation changed
>>>>> dramatically. It seems convection processes barely impact oxygen at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone else seen this behavior? Any suggestions for tests I can
>>>>> run to figure out what's wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Yuxin
>>>>> --
>>>>> Yuxin Zhou
>>>>> https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/
>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/*yzhou/__;fg!!KwNVnqRv!XGV-_ZoSHtQ8Iafno1yNILLkNCN6MaDMwIwpWla_Ftn5cl116QSs05k-WzMaoC6wDGs$>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>>>>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>>>>>
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support__;!!KwNVnqRv!XGV-_ZoSHtQ8Iafno1yNILLkNCN6MaDMwIwpWla_Ftn5cl116QSs05k-WzMa3wNpf4E$
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>>>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>>>> http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yuxin Zhou
>>> https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ldeo.columbia.edu_-7Eyzhou_&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=2PWwsb3Wd06-6UTA59-cjHS6zgYgdOO_wwZosqjdTdc&e=>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MITgcm-support mailing listMITgcm-support at mitgcm.orghttp://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christoph Voelker
>>> Alfred Wegener Institute
>>> Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
>>> Am Handelshafen 12
>>> 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
>>> e: Christoph.Voelker at awi.de
>>> t: +49 471 4831 1848
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>>> http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Yuxin Zhou
>> https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ldeo.columbia.edu_-7Eyzhou_&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=2PWwsb3Wd06-6UTA59-cjHS6zgYgdOO_wwZosqjdTdc&e=>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwICAg&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Dr. Manfredi Manizza
> Geosciences Research Division
> Scripps Institution of Oceanography
> University of California San Diego
> 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0244
> email : mmanizza at ucsd.edu
> tel   : +1-858-534-7094
> web   : http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/mmanizza/
>
> web   : https://mmanizza.scrippsprofiles.ucsd.edu/
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>

-- 
Yuxin Zhou
https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 45030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 58707 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 52824 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 54004 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0010.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 59168 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0011.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 59071 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0012.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 55543 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210907/1cac3035/attachment-0013.png>