<div dir="ltr">Dear Manfredi,<div>Thank you for your response. I hosed 1 Sv of freshwater into the North Atlantic for 1,000 years. The O2 concentration difference between the 1000th and 1st year is shown below. It shows the deoxygenation of the water previously occupied by the NADW as expected. </div><div><img src="cid:ii_ktaxarop6" alt="image.png" width="452" height="239" style="margin-right: 0px;"><br></div><div><br></div><div>Again, thanks for the help everyone! </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Yuxin</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:48 PM Manfredi Manizza <<a href="mailto:mmanizza@ucsd.edu">mmanizza@ucsd.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Yuxin,<div><br><div>First of all, I agree with all the suggestions from Christoph. </div><div><br></div><div>Furthemore, normally during the experiments of climate change (climate warming I mean) you see the tracers distribution changinging</div><div>on a centennial time scale in the upper/mid ocean because the perturbation of climate continues and it also increases with time.</div><div><br></div><div>In your case, it seems that you are applying a perturbation for a blink of an eye and you expect the system</div><div>to change. The timescale of your climate perturbation is way too short.</div><div>I doubt that the change in advection scheme will do something on a short run.</div><div><br></div><div>What you use is a cheap set-up to run as far as computing time is concerned</div><div>so you coud/shoud run it for long(er) time with the same perturbation (adding fresh water in the NA) </div><div>applied each year (on the order of centuries) and then look at the results as physical and bgc tracer distribution.</div><div><br></div><div>Also try to look at other papers that have done some paleo experiments relative to ocean oxygenation</div><div>with models and see if you get similar results or which kind of time scale they deal with to perturb the 3D tracer distribution.</div><div><br></div><div>I hope what I said here helps and makes sense.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Manfredi</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 5:45 PM Yuxin Zhou <<a href="mailto:yzhou@ldeo.columbia.edu" target="_blank">yzhou@ldeo.columbia.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear Christoph,<div>Your suggestions make a lot of sense. Thanks for pointing them out!</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Yuxin</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:52 AM Christoph Voelker <<a href="mailto:christoph.voelker@awi.de" target="_blank">christoph.voelker@awi.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Dear Yuxin, <br>
</p>
<p>in both of your setups I would not expect much response in the
deep oxygen. In the first, AMOC recovers probably quickly, so
there is not much reason to change. In the second, ten years is
still fairly short, for changing tracer distributions in the
deeper parts of the ocean. The timescale of ventilation of
intermediate waters is on the order of several decades, in the
deep ocean it is centuries to millenia. So I expect yo will at
least have to run 1000 years with continuously changed overtrning
to see some larger effects in the deep North Atlantic. Maybe have
a look at the distribution of CFCs or anthropogenic carbon in the
North Atlantic from the GLODAP data base; then you see
observations of how far a signal from the surface penetrates
within the deep Atlantic within a few decades. <br>
</p>
<p>Cheers, Christoph<br>
</p>
<div>Am 03.09.21 um 02:45 schrieb Yuxin
Zhou:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi Spencer,
<div>Thanks for the reply. I tested out two of your ideas. After
hosing for one year, I first let the AMOC recover for 100
years. Oxygen basically remained the same. Then I hosed with
5Sv of freshwater for ten years. AMOC is basically gone at
this point:</div>
<div><img src="cid:17bae402f8ecb971f161" alt="image.png" width="461" height="250"><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>However, oxygen still didn't change much:</div>
<div><img src="cid:17bae402f8ecb971f162" alt="image.png" width="450" height="239"><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Going forward, I might test out the different advection
schemes and other ptracer parameters to see if that helps.
Again, I appreciate your help.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div>Yuxin</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:29
PM Spencer Jones <<a href="mailto:spencerjones@tamu.edu" target="_blank">spencerjones@tamu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Yuxin,
<div>It seems to me that maybe you just didn't run for long
enough to see any change in the oxygen concentration. From
your email it seems like you only ran for 1 year. Is that
right? I wouldn't expect the oxygen concentration to
change until several years (maybe even decades) after
hosing has taken place, and only to change if the
reduction in the AMOC continues (i.e. you might want to
continue hosing, rather than switching it off). </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'm not sure why tutorial_global_oce_biogeo doesn't
match with observations, but usually the tutorial
experiments are set up to demonstrate the model
functionality, not to provide a very realistic simulation.
You might need to put more work into improving the forcing
fields and/or resolution in order to get realistic
output. </div>
<div>Good luck , </div>
<div>Spencer</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at
9:28 PM Yuxin Zhou <<a href="mailto:yzhou@ldeo.columbia.edu" target="_blank">yzhou@ldeo.columbia.edu</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Hi all,
<div>I'm running the tutorial_global_oce_biogeo
experiment and analyzing the oxygen results and I
found some weird behaviors. Any help would be
appreciated.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Here is the AMOC stream function in equilibrium,
which looks normal:</div>
<div><img src="cid:17bae402f8ecb971f163" alt="image.png" width="461" height="250"><br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Here is the AMOC stream function after a hosing
of 5 Sv for one year (by increasing precipitation in
the 50-70N North Atlantic region), which looks
normal too. It shows a weakened NADW:</div>
<div><img src="cid:17bae402f8ecb971f164" alt="image.png" width="461" height="250"><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Here is the oxygen concentration of the AMOC
cross-section in equilibrium:</div>
<div><img src="cid:17bae402f8ecb971f165" alt="image.png" width="450" height="239"><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Here is the oxygen concentration after the
hosing:</div>
<div><img src="cid:17bae402f8ecb971f166" alt="image.png" width="450" height="239"><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Firstly, the oxygen concentration of the AMOC in
equilibrium does not reflect modern observations
such as the World Ocean Atlas, which shows
oxygenated water closely following the presence of
the NADW. Secondly, oxygen basically doesn't change
even though circulation changed dramatically. It
seems convection processes barely impact oxygen at
all.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Has anyone else seen this behavior? Any
suggestions for tests I can run to figure out what's
wrong?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Yuxin</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Yuxin Zhou
<div><a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/*yzhou/__;fg!!KwNVnqRv!XGV-_ZoSHtQ8Iafno1yNILLkNCN6MaDMwIwpWla_Ftn5cl116QSs05k-WzMaoC6wDGs$" target="_blank">https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
MITgcm-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org" target="_blank">MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support__;!!KwNVnqRv!XGV-_ZoSHtQ8Iafno1yNILLkNCN6MaDMwIwpWla_Ftn5cl116QSs05k-WzMa3wNpf4E$" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support__;!!KwNVnqRv!XGV-_ZoSHtQ8Iafno1yNILLkNCN6MaDMwIwpWla_Ftn5cl116QSs05k-WzMa3wNpf4E$</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
MITgcm-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org" target="_blank">MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Yuxin Zhou
<div><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ldeo.columbia.edu_-7Eyzhou_&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=2PWwsb3Wd06-6UTA59-cjHS6zgYgdOO_wwZosqjdTdc&e=" target="_blank">https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
MITgcm-support mailing list
<a href="mailto:MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org" target="_blank">MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org</a>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=" target="_blank">http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre cols="72">--
Christoph Voelker
Alfred Wegener Institute
Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
Am Handelshafen 12
27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
e: <a href="mailto:Christoph.Voelker@awi.de" target="_blank">Christoph.Voelker@awi.de</a>
t: +49 471 4831 1848</pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
MITgcm-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org" target="_blank">MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Yuxin Zhou<div><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ldeo.columbia.edu_-7Eyzhou_&d=DwMFaQ&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=2PWwsb3Wd06-6UTA59-cjHS6zgYgdOO_wwZosqjdTdc&e=" target="_blank">https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/</a><br></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
MITgcm-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org" target="_blank">MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwICAg&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.mitgcm.org_mailman_listinfo_mitgcm-2Dsupport&d=DwICAg&c=-35OiAkTchMrZOngvJPOeA&r=igpxhFyItwkD6Vnn8g54Ybzj3kX5f-S1LY9JKm2YT1c&m=5RRKYrzBx0Ip12mHGJEGgcA7HZwj22DeGL2yqzP45xw&s=qVTFFzLPKT4fGMLWEycvKMFSJWV497LFejrmUkxBM1s&e=</a> <br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><pre cols="72">Dr. Manfredi Manizza
Geosciences Research Division
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0244
email : <a href="mailto:mmanizza@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">mmanizza@ucsd.edu</a>
tel : +1-858-534-7094
web : <a href="http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/mmanizza/" target="_blank">http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/mmanizza/</a> </pre><pre cols="72">web : <a href="https://mmanizza.scrippsprofiles.ucsd.edu/" style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" target="_blank">https://mmanizza.scrippsprofiles.ucsd.edu/</a></pre></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
MITgcm-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org" target="_blank">MITgcm-support@mitgcm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Yuxin Zhou<div><a href="https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/" target="_blank">https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~yzhou/</a><br></div></div></div>