[MITgcm-support] Stratification creating current without forcing (Martin Losch)
Michael Spall
mspall at whoi.edu
Thu Nov 28 09:11:30 EST 2019
Hi Nadine,
This may result from diffusion and the no-flux into the bottom. This
forces the isopycnals to be perpendicular to the topography which,
for a sloping bottom gives rise to pressure gradients and a geostrophic
flow. I found something similar in the past.
Mike
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 28, 2019, at 6:00 AM, Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Nadine,
>
> this is weird, can you make your configuration available, so I can run it? I guess a coarse grained version would be enough? (code directory, and input directory with bathymetry, etc, and startification, please don’t post the files to this list, but rather a link).
>
> Martin
>
>> On 28. Nov 2019, at 10:42, Nadine Steiger <Nadine.Steiger at uib.no> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> salinity does not go below or above the initial values.
>>
>> When creating the hydrogSaltFile, I precribe the salinity everywhere, as I figured that MITgcm masks the topography during initialization.
>>
>> I tried to prescribe salinity through hydrogSaltFile and through sRefFile, but I get the same issue in both cases.
>>
>> When I turn off saltStepping and saltAdvection, the ocean stays in rest.
>>
>> When I use a flat bottom instead of a channel, the problem does not occur either.
>>
>> Nadine
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nadine Steiger
>> PhD Candidate
>> University of Bergen | Geophysical Institute
>> Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list