[MITgcm-support] Hello

[smaeilpour]

Hi, 

I have been having some problem compiling my code today, after doing 

> make depend

 I get the following error

../../../tools/cyrus-imapd-makedepend/makedepend: warning :
mdsio_readfield.F (reading SUPPORT.h, line 179): cannot find include
file "mpif.h"  
          
           not in mpif.h
           not in mpif.h
           not in    opt/ifort/8.0.044/include/mpif.h
../../../tools/f90makedepend>>makefile


and as a result I cannot compile the code.
I am sure i have overlooked something quite simple.

any Idea

thanks a lot in advance
saeid






--------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 11/10/16, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at mit.edu> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] river runoff
 To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
 Date: Thursday, November 10, 2016, 10:42 AM
 
 Hi,
 
 There are few available options for including
 run-off:
 
 1) the most
 commonly used is to include just in the surface level,
  as part of surface forcing (substracted to EmP
 into EmPmR).
  Obviously this approach is not
 great for deep estuary with high
  vertical
 resolution (small dz).
  And the effect on
 sea-level is accounted for with
 useRealFreshWaterFlux=.TRUE.,
  and in a
 consistent way for any tracers when Non-Lin Freee-surface
 is
  used.
  In this case, the
 run-off can be provide as part of EmPmR or
 
 separately (e.g., using pkg/exf), but only the run-off that
 fall
  on ocean grid cell (wet-cell) will be
 considered.
 
 2) If you want
 to address the issue of deep estuaries, you can 
   try to prescribe a 3-D run-off input (file:
 addMassFile loaded into 
   model 2-D array
 "addMass") using selectAddFluid=1.
   This requires to compile with #define
 ALLOW_ADDFLUID
 
   Note that
 the current code does not provide an option to prescribe
   time dependent "addMass" inflow
 (but should not be difficult to add).
 
 3) And the last option, as described by Andrea,
 is to use OBCS. This enable 
   to account,
 in the momentum budget, for the speed of the incoming
 run-off.
   Probably useful at very high to
 high resolution (bot horizontal and vertical)
   but may be not so important at lower
 resolution.
 
 Cheers,
 Jean-Michel
 
 On
 Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 08:31:34AM +0100, Andrea Cimatoribus
 wrote:
 > Certainly not the most expert
 around here, but I have been dealing
 >
 with this lately, so I can try an answer.
 > 
 > The neatest way to
 do it is with obcs package, that is, the open
 > boundary package. In data.obcs you can
 define the (vertical) grid
 > faces
 through which you want to apply the discharge (see
 manual).
 > Using the correct grid metric,
 you can set the discharge velocity to
 >
 match the total volume discharge (and you can easily check
 if you
 > are doing it right using the
 diagnostic output). The simplest way to
 >
 impose a time-variable discharge and temperature is via the
 exf
 > package, in a new namelist which is
 provided by the OBCS package,
 > something
 along these lines:
 > 
 &EXF_NML_OBCS
 > # OBCS prescribe
 >  obcsEstartdate1   =
 20080101,
 > 
 obcsEstartdate2   = 010000,
 >  obcsEperiod       =
 3600.,
 >  obcsWstartdate1   =
 20080101,
 > 
 obcsWstartdate2   = 010000,
 >  obcsWperiod       =
 3600.,
 >  &
 > As
 far as I understand, the temperature of the discharge must
 span
 > exactly the same time interval and
 have the same periodicity as the
 >
 velocity.
 > The file names containing the
 data are defined in the data.obcs
 >
 (again, see manual).
 > 
 > Hope this helps, best,
 > 
 > Andrea
 Cimatoribus
 > postdoctoral researcher
 > EPFL ENAC IIE ECOL
 > https://people.epfl.ch/andrea.cimatoribus
 > 
 > On 09/11/16 03:26,
 ????????? wrote:
 > >Hi
 > >
 > >I am using
 mitgcm to simulate SST variation in coastal area with
 large
 > >runoff. Does anyone tell me
 how to set up the river? How mitgcm deal
 > >with river mouth?
 >
 >
 > >I've known that the runoff
 should be added to the freshwater flux EmPmR,
 > >but how to represent the effect of a
 river by gridded runoff data is not
 >
 >clear to me (should the river grid point be contacted
 with ocean
 > >interior or
 boundary?).
 > >
 >
 >It seems that the test cases in mitgcm do not provide
 enough river
 > >information.
 > >
 > >I'd
 appreciate any help.
 > >
 > >
 >
 >------------------
 > >Best
 regards
 > >
 >
 >Yu-Kun Qian (?????????)
 > >Center
 for Monsoon and Environment Research
 >
 >Department of Atmospheric Sciences
 >
 >School of Environmental Science and Engineering
 > >Sun Yat-sen University
 > >No. 135 Xingang West Road, Haizhu
 District
 > >Guangzhou, 510275, P.R.
 China
 > >Tel; 020-84115227
 > >Email: qianyk at mail3.sysu.edu.cn
 <mailto:qianyk at mail2.sysu.edu.cn>
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 >
 >_______________________________________________
 > >MITgcm-support mailing list
 > >MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
 > >http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
 >
 >
 > 
 >
 _______________________________________________
 > MITgcm-support mailing list
 > MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
 > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
 
 _______________________________________________
 MITgcm-support mailing list
 MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
 http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support