[MITgcm-support] Baroclinic instability with MPI run
Noriyuki Yamamoto
nymmto at kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Thu Jan 22 07:02:18 EST 2015
Hi all,
I'm running into a problem with MPI run.
Outputs from mpi and no-mpi run differ qualitatively.
This seems to be the same problem reported in "Independ Tiling" thread
(http://forge.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/mitgcm-support/2014-March/009017.html).
Is there any progress about it?
If not, I hope this information will add some clues to fixing up.
The model has a zonally periodic channel and is forced by westerly wind
and temperature restoring along the northen and southern wall in
mid-high latitude.
I tested some cases with different topography.
In flat-bottomed case with no-mpi, baroclinic instability develops and
cascades up to larger scales.
But with mpi, the zonal wavenumber of baroclinic instability is fixed to
nPx during the 3000-day integration (I tested nPx = 16, 20) and doesn't
cascade up.
In zonally wavy (sinusoidal wave whose k is not nPx) topography case
with mpi using the same mpi executable file (compiled by genmake -mpi)
as flat-bottomed case,
baroclinic instablity cascades up and the result seems to be similar to
that of no-mpi run though I checked only early surface temperature
distribution.
In MPI run I tried two patterns of (nPx, nPy) = (16, 4), (20,4).
I compiled MITgcm codes by Intel compiler 13.1.3 with Cray MPI library
6.3.0 on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64).
MITgcm version is checkpoint64u (sorry that it's no latest version).
If necessary, I will attach data and SIZE.h files later.
Sorry for my poor English.
Noriyuki.
--
Noriyuki Yamamoto
PhD Student - Physical Oceanography Group
Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University.
Mail:nymmto at kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Tel:+81-75-753-3924
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list