[MITgcm-support] External forcing - runoff
Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248)
Dimitris.Menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Sat Aug 10 06:38:31 EDT 2013
The format of specifying the longitude and the latitude is different:
_RL runoff_lon0, runoff_lon_inc
_RL runoff_lat0, runoff_lat_inc(MAX_LAT_INC)
That is, runoff_lon_inc is a constant while
runoff_lat_inc is a vector.
This is so as to allow uneven increments in latitude, e.g., a Gaussian grid.
For 1/4-degree grid, you could have, e.g.:
runoff_lon0 = 0.125D0,
runoff_lon_inc = 0.25D0,
runoff_lat0 = -89.875D0,
runoff_lat_inc = 719*0.25D0,
You can also specify runoff on the full model grid by setting variable:
runoff_interpMethod = 0,
On Aug 9, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Jonathan Whitefield wrote:
> I'm working on a model run with a higher resolution forcing for river
> runoff, and I'm trying to understand some of the lines in data.exf:
>
> runoff_lon0 = 0.50D0,
> runoff_lon_inc = 1.0D0,
> runoff_lat0 = -89.5D0,
> runoff_lat_inc = 179*1.,
>
> I get the first two lines - the first longitude box is at 0.5 degrees,
> and each subsequent box is 1 degree more. It's the same as Matlab
> saying lon=0.5:1:359.5. The third line I'm also fine with - the
> latitude starts at -89.5. However, I don't get the last line. The
> increase between cells is a different format to lon_inc. Is this
> because lat is vertical, and it should be a column of 179 "1"s? Why is
> it not just 1.0D0 as for lon_inc?
>
> If I wanted to do a quarter degree resolution, should I have
> runoff_lat_inc = 1439*0.25?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> --
> Jonathan Whitefield, M.Sc.
> Ph.D. Student, Physical Oceanography
>
> 110 O'Neill Building,
> P.O. Box 757220
> University of Alaska Fairbanks
> Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220
>
> Phone: (907) 474-5184
> Fax: (907) 474-5863
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list