[MITgcm-support] exf interp for smooth wind stress curl

[Chris Hill]

Last I recall J-M and I were waiting to see Matt's code - since the
edges he had did not look entirely consistent
with interpolation error.

Chris

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Matthew Mazloff <mmazloff at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> nope -- never tried Chris' superduper fix -- or maybe he has a higher
> resolution atmospheric reanalysis hidden in the closet?
>
> -Matt
>
>
> On May 17, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
>
>> Yes, we have artifacts at edges of atmospheric forcing grid.
>>
>> So Chris never got back to you with his superduper offline fix for this
>> problem?
>>
>> Dimitris Menemenlis
>>
>> On May 17, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Matthew Mazloff wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dimitris,
>>>
>>> I do use  bicubic interpolation on all NCEP fields -- but I still have
>>> some artifacts in my wind stress curl for my CASE (1/16^o) setup.  Is
>>> this what you are finding?
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>> On May 17, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chris and Matt, did issue below regarding bicubic exf_interp ever
>>>> get resolved?
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to get smooth wind stress curl for hi-res
>>>> integrations from coarse-res atmospheric forcing?
>>>>
>>>> Dimitris
>>>>
>>>> http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/2009-October/006305.html
>>>>
>>>>> Hi matt
>>>>>
>>>>> can you put your wind fields, grid etc... Somewhere @ MIT. I have
>>>>> code
>>>>> to fix this offline, but have never found a real setup where it
>>>>> mattered!
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>