[MITgcm-support] Re: routines to set geostrophically balanced initial conditions

q li qliuri at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 28 12:57:32 EDT 2009


Nico,

What do these 4 options do in the model, especially MomStepping? In the beginning, do they use iteration or something else to get rid of ageostrophic movement?

Li




________________________________
From: Nico Wienders <wienders at ocean.fsu.edu>
To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 4:30:50 PM
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] Re: routines to set geostrophically balanced initial conditions


On Aug 27, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Georgy Manucharyan wrote:

> Hello,
>  Are there any routines that could properly set geostrophically balanced initial conditions ( from a given density field calculate U,V,Eta ) ?  I made it myself but initial conditions are not in exact balance, and I'm getting ageostrophic flow.
> Thanks in advance for help,
> Georgy.

I just did that recently, thanks to JMC and CNH, by setting

MomStepping=.TRUE.,
useCoriolis=.TRUE.,
MomAdvection=.FALSE.,
MomViscosity=.FALSE.,

in my data file. This way pretty much only geostrophy is left. nw















_______________________________________________
MITgcm-support mailing list
MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20090828/d09d4c97/attachment.htm>


More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list