[MITgcm-support] Bug in rbcs_fields_load.F
Stephanie Dutkiewicz
stephd at ocean.mit.edu
Mon Nov 19 13:32:26 EST 2007
this problem seems to have been taken care of just
after checkpoint58q_post.. (see CVS revision 1.5
for this routine)
Christopher - could you check and see if the
latest code takes care of these problems for you.
thanks
steph
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Christopher L. Wolfe wrote:
>
> Hi modelers,
>
> There is a bug in rbcs_fields_load.F that causes parts of the ptracer
> relaxation fields to be loaded into the tile overlap region instead of the
> tile interior. This can cause obscure errors in the relaxation pattern.
>
> Here is a diff of the incorrect, old file (<) compared to the new, corrected
> file (>):
>
> 162c162
> < & 'RS', Nr, rbcptracer0(1,1,1,1,1,iTracer), intime0, myThid )
> ---
>> & 'RS', Nr, rbcptracer0(1-Olx,1-Oly,1,1,1,iTracer), intime0,
>> myThid )
> 164c164
> < & 'RS', Nr, rbcptracer1(1,1,1,1,1,iTracer), intime1, myThid )
> ---
>> & 'RS', Nr, rbcptracer1(1-Olx,1-Oly,1,1,1,iTracer), intime1,
>> myThid )
> 182,183c182,183
> < _EXCH_XYZ_R4(rbcptracer0(1,1,1,1,1,iTracer),myThid)
> < _EXCH_XYZ_R4(rbcptracer1(1,1,1,1,1,iTracer),myThid)
> ---
>> _EXCH_XYZ_R4(rbcptracer0(1-Olx,1-Oly,1,1,1,iTracer),myThid)
>> _EXCH_XYZ_R4(rbcptracer1(1-Olx,1-Oly,1,1,1,iTracer),myThid)
>
> This diff is against checkpoint58q_post, but I don't believe that this file
> has changed in the recent updates.
>
> If anyone knows who maintains the RBCS package, please give them a heads up
> for me.
>
> Christopher
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Christopher L. Wolfe 858-534-4560
> Physical Oceanography Research Division OAR 357
> Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD clwolfe at ucsd.edu
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list