[MITgcm-support] obcs and seaice
Jinlun Zhang
zhang at apl.washington.edu
Thu Jun 9 14:42:58 EDT 2005
Hi Tom,
One way to handle sea ice open boundary is to set ice strength (P) to
zero at the open boundary. This has been quite successful for
simulations over the whole Arctic that has limited size of open
boundaries. I have not implemented this treatment in MITgcm yet. In
your case, ice inflow is a major source, and the treatment may not be
appropriate. For ice dynamics, the Von Neumann obc should be used, which
needs some modifications to the LSR dynamics solver. But we should
certainly try things like those used for ptracer obc.
By the way, if you want to specify ice thickness at your ob, you might
want to use the ice thickness fields I created. The fields were created
by assimilating SSM/I ice concentration and have a very good match with
submarine observations of ice thickness. The fields from 1979 to 2004
can be found on http://psc.apl.washington.edu/IDAO.
Jinlun
Tom Haine wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>I need to allow sea ice to be imported into my Denmark Strait model
>across open boundaries. I see that seaice is not implemented in obcs
>currently. Martin Losch has made some suggestions about implementing
>ptracer in obcs (http://forge.csail.mit.edu/pipermail/mitgcm-
>support/2004-November/002715.html). Can I simply customize this idea for
>seaice variables? Are there other issues I should worry about?
>
>Thanks, Tom.
>
>
--
Jinlun Zhang
Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory
University of Washington, 1013 NE 40th St, Seattle, WA 98105-6698
Phone: (206)-543-5569 Fax: (206)-616-3142
zhang at apl.washington.edu
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/IDAO
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list