[MITgcm-support] Natural Boundary Conditions

[Gianmaria Sannino]

ciao Martin,

thanks, but I've alread seen that exp.
What actually happens is that cg2d slowly increases to values that are > 0. 
I'm using also the exact conservation option.
When the freshwaterflux is FALSE the cg2d is 10^-13 !!

do you have other ideas??

a presto
gm


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Losch" <mlosch at awi-bremerhaven.de>
To: <mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] Natural Boundary Conditions


> HI Gianmaria,
>
> have a look at, e.g., verification/global_ocean.90x40x15/ (an experiment 
> which uses "realFreshWaterFlux=.true.") and compare the data-files and 
> CPP-Flags etc with your set-up. Maybe that can give your a clue, why your 
> run is blowing up (is it really blowing up?)
>
> Martin
>
> On Jul 10, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Gianmaria Sannino wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm trying to use the Natural Boundary Conditions in the MITgcm.
>> To do this I've set useRealFreshWaterFlux to TRUE in the data file, but 
>> after that the cg2d variable increases toward unstable values respect to 
>> the simulation with useRealFreshWaterFlux set to FALSE. I've also used 
>> the non linear free surface option.
>> Is there anyone can help me?
>>
>> thanks
>> gianmaria
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support