[MITgcm-support] Running C19 on a Linux PC cluster

eyulaeva at ucsd.edu eyulaeva at ucsd.edu
Wed Feb 18 17:57:02 EST 2004


Chris, hi:
Thanks for your reply
I will see if we can use the newer version of MIT for  our purposes.
We are coupling MIT ocean with AGCM and wanted to use JPL assimilation
products for initialization. We wanted to use the  exactly same version of
the model they are using for their operational analysis. However,  we can
try to use R1 version with the initial conditions obtained from C19.

I'll get back to you   if this does not work out
Thanks again

Elena


> Hi Elena,
>
>  The problem is most likely with compiler options, libraries that get
> linked
> in or the byte ordering of the input files you are using. If you send one
> of
> your STDOUT files and the Makefile for IRIX64 and Linux cluster to
> mitgcm-support that may give us a clue
>
>  More generally is there a reason why you want to you use this particular
> version. It is very hard for us to support lots of old setups - we aren't
> a
> very big group! It would make it easier for us to help if you were using
> an
> up to date code revision.
>
> Chris Hill
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org
>> [mailto:mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of Elena Yulaeva
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:55 PM
>> To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> Subject: [MITgcm-support] Running C19 on a Linux PC cluster
>>
>> I have problems running the prerelease version of MIT GCM C19
>> at a Linux PC cluster. The output fields of a forwrad run
>> are unrealistic and differ from  the ones obtained at IRIX64.
>>  I am wondering if anyone has ever run this version on a PC cluster?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Elena
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-support mailing list
>> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
>> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
>>
>




More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list