[MITgcm-support] Rapid vote on EXF_OPTIONS.h versus EXF_CPPOPTIONS.h

[Chris Hill]

I vote for changing it. 

Within reason we should try and bring things up to MITgcm code while we
are re-organizing, but we all have to pitch in - we shouldn't lumber Ed
with having to fix our past misbehavior.

Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org 
> [mailto:mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of 
> Alistair Adcroft
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:46 AM
> To: MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> Subject: [MITgcm-support] Rapid vote on EXF_OPTIONS.h versus 
> EXF_CPPOPTIONS.h
> 
> 
> In the spirit of Californian elections lets have a rapid vote 
> (decision in 30 mins) on whether EXF_CPPOPTIONS.h is renamed 
> EXF_OPTIONS.h or stays as is.  The norm is not to have CPP in 
> the name but how much headache will I get if I've made the 
> change (I already did it inadvertently).
> 
> Cast your votes!
> 
> A.
> --
> Dr Alistair Adcroft            http://www.mit.edu/~adcroft
> MIT Climate Modeling Initiative        tel: (617) 253-5938
> EAPS 54-1523,  77 Massachusetts Ave,  Cambridge,  MA,  USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org 
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-> support
>