[Mitgcm-support] Note: January 18, 2001
mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org
mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org
Wed Jul 9 15:56:37 EDT 2003
HyperNews notification of new message. See:
http://escher.JPL.NASA.GOV:2000/HyperNews/get/forums/wkmtg/79.html
=======================================================================
NOTES FROM THE ASSIMILATION MEETING : 18 January 2001
1) American Meteorological Society Meeting
-------------------------------------------
- Detlef and Ichiro presented progress of ECCO at the AMS meeting.
The participation was a request by NOPP. For the JPL part, skill
of the K-filter and adjoint was presented based on comparisons
with independent data (T/P, bottom pressure, TAO T, surface U).
Adjoint sensitivity study of the ITF was also described.
Validating the skill of the filter per se, although a
prerequisite, does not pique the general interest including those
of HQ managers. We need to collectively think of how to make a
bigger impact. Following points were brought up;
a) It is unlikely that a zero order qualitative change in our
understanding/description of ocean circulation is going to
result from assimilation.
b) What can we (assimilation) do that nobody else can do (e.g.,
ad hoc assimilation, modeling, data analyses)? One example is
that we can produce error bars to our estimate.
c) Focus analyses on specific features that assimilation made a
difference; e.g., surface equatorial circulation changes from
Jan-Mar 1997 estimated by adjoint.
d) Examine what difference there are between simulation and
assimilation.
e) Begin analyzing the oceanographic features of the assimilation
regardless of specific impact of the assimilation.
2) K-filter
------------
- The detrended baroclinic filter does appear to get rid of the
large degradation. This figure[1] compares the skill of one of the
baroclinic filter runs without removing trend (left) and with
removing trend (right). The skill is measured by the decrease
(shown as positive number) in model-data residual variance
(cm^2) from the unconstrained control run. [The figure shown at
the meeting was in error. The figure above is the corrected
one, and for the full 5-year period 1993-1997.] The large
degradation east of Taiwan has significantly diminished in the
detrended assimilation.
- All lost runs have now been recovered. The barotropic and
baroclinic filters have each been run with two different prior
errors (process noise); NCEP wind covariance, scaled NCEP wind
covariance to match simulation-data difference. In addition, a
detrended version of the NCEP wind covariance runs are being
carried out (baroclinic is done. barotropic is nearly
complete.)
- The combined barotropic and baroclinic filter program has been
debugged. The code will now be tested for a particular choice
of prior errors.
- The assimilation code with the detrending algorithm will be
placed on CVS.
3) Adjoint
-----------
- Two additional variations of the 3-month adjoint did not improve
the solution much;
a) Changed wind preconditioning factor to be twice as sensitive
b) Reduced temperature weights near the surface based on
comparisons with TAO
- The 1-year adjoint assimilation will commence using the weights
and preconditioners used in the 3-month assimilation.
Calculations will be conducted at Ames. The optimized solution
to the 3-month adjoint has a 25% smaller initial cost function
than the control.
4) Ames
---------
- The "test" queue at Ames is no longer available.
- Command
acct_ytd
provides information of year-to-date usage. However, this usage
reflects that of the JPL-Goddard allocation as a whole.
L.Eversole says not to worry about how much we've used; if we run
out, he will try to get some more.
- Oversubscription makes steger unsuitable to do adjoint; the
calculation takes too long. However, the 8-hour queue would work
OK for the K-filter.
5) Other
---------
- A 50+ year run (1947-2000) is being prepared. Forcing from
1952-2000 is present on HPSS. Those of 1947-1951 will be
retrieved from NCAR. A 2-deg by 2-deg with 23-levels (SIO
configuration) will be done first, then one in c20000630
configuration. A northern and southern sponge layer may need to
be implemented to minimize the trend arising from lack of deep
water production over the long integration. Comparisons will be
made between using the latest MIT release and our c20000630 code.
- Forcing for '99 to Oct '00 is being retrieved from NCAR. Tony is
streamlining the code for somebody else to take over for future
retrievals.
- Results Dimitris put together for the CO2 meeting at GSFC
regarding MIT's biogeochemical studies using our control results
will be added to our web-site.
- Purchasing TAF through procurement may take several months due to
complications associated with the foreign contract. We could
expedite the purchase by using P-card, except for P-card's upper
limit on cost (several $K). We need to see if we can purchase
TAF by ~4 installments.
- Description of optimization flags used in c20000630 has been
posted[2].
- The OS on the three linux boxes (nautilus, stormy, giant) is
being upgraded to RedHat 7.0. This is to prevent break-ins and to
make system administration simple. However, the upgrade for
nautilus encountered problems; the partition table of the main
disk was lost. Home directory is being recovered from backup,
but some directories are inaccessible. Will attempt recovery by
outside contractor. All users should double check that their
files are regularly backed up.
- Lee is comparing c20000630 and T/P sea level in the North Pacific
associated with reflected signals from the east coast. There is
coherence between the two. Although the reflected signal is
small, it appears to be amplified from time-to-time by wind
events.
- Tony and Xiaoyun are examining reflection and transmission of
equatorial waves at the west end of the tropical Pacific.
- Nick has concluded that estimating pressure driven non-IB signal
would be more complicated than estimating wind-forced solutions
because of the dominance of IB being a static response.
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://escher.JPL.NASA.GOV:2000/hosts/escher/escher2/medea/if/forum/t73f5e_0111.ps
[2] http://escher.JPL.NASA.GOV:2000/HyperNews/get/forums/comp/22.html
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list