[Mitgcm-support] Re: c27

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

Hi Patrick,

 Isn't the SubAtl case also be a good test for
KPP? Perhaps we should commit Dimitris to
making a KPP test case around that 
configuration. What do you think? Ultimately
KPP needs to be part of the TAMC tests for you 
ECCO guys. Patrick - can you talk to Dimitri about this?

 I will make a coarse resolution
climatalogical TAMC sensitivity example sometime :-).
You could also use that as a TAMC validation test 
case if you like - it won't have KPP though.
 
 For now I think the order looks like

 c28 - TAMC no test
 c29 - KPP 
 c30 - OBC 
 c31 - TAMC with test
 c32 - TAMC with test including KPP
 c33 - Complete rearrangment of the code
       to include pluggable atmos. physics, Redi, GM,
       coupling interface etc....
 c34.... repeat of c28-c32 :-)
 Sealion release!!!

 That ought to confuse everybody enough!

Chris

Patrick Heimbach wrote:
> 
> Alistair,
> 
> since we've said not to include the routines
> the_model_main.F and initialise_fixed.F at the present stage
> I propose not to have a test case for TAMC for the moment.
> Nevertheless, I commit to prepare one based on the
> 2x2 deg. SubAtl case soon.
> 
> So, for now I'll go ahaed and commit.
> (Gosh, all these commitments, and I'm not even married yet...)
> 
> Patrick
>