[Mitgcm-support] Re: c37_adj

[mitgcm-support at dev.mitgcm.org]

Patrick,

 If you have something thats seems tested OK then you should check it
in on the "pre38" branch.

Chris
Patrick Heimbach wrote:
> 
> Alistair,
> 
> in case you read your mails over the WE:
> I've started to incorporate the changes to c37 to make
> it adjointable as stand-alone. After all I have to try
> to catch up with you guys.
> Right now I have all the necessary steps to at least
> pass it to TAMC and get a full dependency analysis
> (the result of that analysis is still anonther question...).
> I'd like to check-in this stuff this WE before leaving.
> Is it OK if I just check in and tag e.g. "c37_adj".
> 
> Patrick