[MITgcm-devel] [MITgcm-cvs] CVS Commit MITgcm_contrib/verification_other/shelfice_remeshing/results

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Jim,

Yes, it's better now. I get some valid comparison:
Y Y Y Y> 8<16 16 16 14 16 16 14 16  1  1  3  1 12 12  9 13  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . FAIL  shelfice_remeshing
However, the agreement is not great.
The convention is that the reference output (output.txt) is supposed to be
generated using "tools/build_options/linux_amd64_gfortran" optfile with zero optimisation
(genmake2 option "-ieee", which is testreport default, or better, option "-devel") 
on platform similar to baudelaire.csail.mit.edu.
This is mentionned in the "HowTo" document, sections 4.2.1 & 4.2.2.

You should have access to baudelaire, but if it's not very easy, you should be able to pick 
a similar platform (and should not matter too much).
And just as reminder, OS version is stored at the top of summary
> http://mitgcm.org/testing/results/2016_03/tr_baudelaire-b_20160315_2/summary.txt
and compiler version is printed in "genmake_state" file:
> http://mitgcm.org/testing/results/2016_03/tr_baudelaire-b_20160315_2/genmake_state

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:14:18PM +0000, Jordan, James R wrote:
> Hi Jean-Michel,
> 
> Have rerun with the updated parameter files, and committed the new output.txt. Hopefully this one works better!
> 
> Jim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel Campin [mailto:jmc at mit.edu]
> Sent: 15 March 2016 13:55
> To: mitgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> Cc: Jordan, James R; dngoldberg at gmail.com; Jean-Michel Campin
> Subject: Re: [MITgcm-cvs] CVS Commit MITgcm_contrib/verification_other/shelfice_remeshing/results
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> It seems that this new output has not been generated with the updated parameter files (all the changes I've made ~ march 1rst), so that the testreport from last night failed for this experiment:
> http://mitgcm.org/testing/results/2016_03/tr_baudelaire-b_20160315_2/summary.txt
> 
> I also take this oportunity to remember everyone that it's probably better to check-in files only in "unix" format file (as oppose to "dos" format).
> The mix of both can be difficult to process (e.g., ignoring the conversion dos --> unix I made on March 1rst, your new output.txt appears having a  "^M" at the end of all lines that are copied form parameter files).
> 
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
> 
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:02:10AM -0400, Daniel N. Goldberg, 54-1423, 6172532977,  wrote:
> > Update of
> > /u/gcmpack/MITgcm_contrib/verification_other/shelfice_remeshing/result
> > s In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv6041/results
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > output.txt
> > Log Message:
> > Corrected remeshing thresholds
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-cvs mailing list
> > MITgcm-cvs at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-cvs
> ________________________________
>  This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
> ________________________________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel