[MITgcm-devel] [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/doc CVS Commit

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

Just replaced the CPP options with run-time variables.
Forward and adjoint obcs tests ran successfully on my laptop.
Crossing fingers and hoping they will survive nightlies.

Thanks for suggestions

Dimitris Menemenlis

On Sep 25, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at ocean.mit.edu> wrote:

> I am curious why we have to add CPP options (11 more) instead of
> run-time parameters, which is generally a better solution.
> Is it motivated by Adjoint issues ? (seems to me that, regarding adjoint,
> skipping some parts should work the same way as when every is used).