[MITgcm-devel] ptracers + no_cost ECCO set-up
Manfredi Manizza
mmanizza at ocean.mit.edu
Tue Oct 22 03:03:01 EDT 2013
Hi,
I am currently coupling the dic package (plus gchem+ptracers) to the
physics of ECCO using a version that Patrick gave me on purpose without
cost function.
At the beginning, I had an error on the declaration
on "maxpass" and "max0" in the tamc.h file.
I fixed it adding these line in PTRACERS_SIZE.h
and compilation went fine
#ifdef ALLOW_AUTODIFF_TAMC
INTEGER iptrkey
INTEGER maxpass
PARAMETER( maxpass = PTRACERS_num + 2 )
#endifB
copying stuff form anothe code form Matt Mazloff...
but I was wondering
if this will conflict when running the code because the set-up is supposed
to run with an optimized forcing and, according to Patrick, with
no computed cost fucntion (as we agreed upon). I have not tried yet...
but maybe knowing this would already save time..
Thanks in advance.
Manfredi
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list