[MITgcm-devel] ptracers + no_cost ECCO set-up

Manfredi Manizza mmanizza at ocean.mit.edu
Tue Oct 22 03:03:01 EDT 2013


Hi,

I am currently coupling the dic package (plus gchem+ptracers) to the 
physics of ECCO using a version that Patrick gave me on purpose without 
cost function.

At the beginning, I had an error on the declaration
on "maxpass" and "max0" in the tamc.h file.

I fixed it adding these line in PTRACERS_SIZE.h
and compilation went fine

#ifdef ALLOW_AUTODIFF_TAMC
       INTEGER    iptrkey
       INTEGER    maxpass
       PARAMETER( maxpass     = PTRACERS_num + 2 )
#endifB

copying stuff form anothe code form Matt Mazloff...
but I was wondering
if this will conflict when running the code because the set-up is supposed
to run with an optimized forcing and, according to Patrick, with
no computed cost fucntion (as we agreed upon). I have not tried yet...
but maybe knowing this would already save time..

Thanks in advance.
Manfredi







More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list