[MITgcm-devel] seaice verification experiments

[Jinlun Zhang]

I have not followed this closely for a while. But if the dynamics solver 
based on C-grid can make most of the stress points either on or inside 
the yield curve, then the B-grid code is probably no longer needed.
Cheers,
Jinlun

On 10/22/2012 10:11 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> B-grid code is not "tested", we just check that we can compile it.
> It's why the switch I proposed will not change any output,
> because none of the 2 experiments curently use dynamics.
> But I see it as a step towards improved offline_exf_seaice
> test case (with dynanmics this time).
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:15:57PM +0000, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
>> Don't know anybody who still uses B-grid seaice code.
>>
>> Dimitris Menemenlis
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Patrick Heimbach wrote:
>>
>>> With regard to legacy code and B-grid:
>>> Are we going to maintain them much longer,
>>> or should we move toward phasing them out?
>>> E.g. switch lab_sea from legacy to current seaice t.d.,
>>> and no longer use the B-grid code.
>>> What do people think?
>>