[MITgcm-devel] [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/tools/build_options CVS Commit

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Dimitris,

I think that if your modified optfile degrade the results of 
the 2+2 test, it's better to go back and leave the new option
commented: the reason is that it's quiet nice to be able
to restart exactly, and if it's no longer the case, it could
disturb other users. I personally don't run the 2+2 test very 
often (apart from the standard verification tests), and it might 
take them some time to realize that they lost this capability.

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:08:49PM -0700, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
> oops.  forgot to answer second question.
> only the older (3700's) columbia boxes are going away.
> the newer (4700's) boxes are staying for foreseeable
> future for problems that require large amounts of shared
> memory and can't be accommodated by pleiades.
> 
> let me know how you want to proceed re optfile.
> We can go back to older (-mp) default if you like
> and convert Constantino's suggestions to comments
> 
> D.
> 
> On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Menemenlis, Dimitris (3248) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > - why bothering about a deprecated option on Columbia ? I thought this
> > system was about to disappear (and there are not going to be much software
> > updates), no ?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel