[MITgcm-devel] possible problem with seaice-ocean stress
Dimitris Menemenlis
menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Thu Jan 17 12:35:19 EST 2008
Martin, since we are moving away from B-grid (and also from EVP, I think), why
not call seaice_ocean_stress outside seaice_dynsolver, as you suggest, with
appropriate warnings in seaice_check or seaice_readparms? The only minor catch
is that we clip ice velocities after calling SEAICE_OCEAN_STRESS so we would
have to move that out of dynsolver too. The other alternative, maybe cleaner
all around, would be to move the DIFFERENT_MULTIPLE test inside
SEAICE_DYNSOLVER. What do you think? D.
--
Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
tel: 818-354-1656; cell: 818-625-6498; fax: 818-393-6720
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list