[MITgcm-devel] Re: package plume

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

> we should have a separated "mypackage_diagnostics_state" to fill-in
> state variable diagnostics only (like: PTRACERS_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE,
> SEAICE_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE, THSICE_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE, LAND_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE)

Should PACKAGE_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE include both prognostic and diagnostic 
variables, as does SEAICE_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE?

SALT_PLUME_DIAGNOSTICS_STATE would only contain diagnostic variables and 
therefore there would be no need for read/write pickup.

D.

-- 
Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at sbcglobal.net>
5056 Oakwood Ave, La Canada, CA 91011-2450
tel/fax: 818-790-6735;   cell: 818-625-6498