[MITgcm-devel] exf runoff and seaice
Dimitris Menemenlis
menemenlis at sbcglobal.net
Thu May 17 12:36:18 EDT 2007
> In the EXF pkg, I am going to replace all the:
> #if defined (ALLOW_RUNOFF) || defined (ALLOW_SEAICE)
> by just
> #ifdef ALLOW_RUNOFF
OK.
> 1) it's not clean.
> (we have some EXF stuff in pkg/seaice, it's documented and
> it's fine ; but I prefer to keep exf without any seaice CPP options)
> 2) it's not right, because those "|| defined (ALLOW_SEAICE)"
> are missing in a significant number of places in pkg/exf
Reason for that is that if SEAICE_EXTERNAL_FORCING is defined, pkg/seaice uses
EXF_FIELDS.h common blocks rather than the SEAICE_FFIELDS common block (see
SEAICE_FFIELDS.h). This means that runoff array must exist, even if it just
filled with zeros, which is why ALLOW_SEAICE is "not" needed everywhere.
> 3) if this is needed, there are other ways to do it,
> the simplest would be to check in seaice_check.F that
> ALLOW_RUNOFF is defined (like what is done for ALLOW_ATM_TEMP,
> ALLOW_DOWNWARD_RADIATION ... etc)
It is needed, so let's add to seaice_check.F. Shall I or will you take care of
this. Also what is decision re SEAICE_EXTERNAL_FORCING flag? Shall we force
pkg/seaice to be useable only in conjunction with pkg/exf?
> I am trying to get a set-up running with exf that would be
> somehow "consistent", and after ~ 20 attempts, still haven't
> figured out what the runoff is doing.
I don't understand question. Do you want to talk on the phone about this?
D.
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list