[MITgcm-devel] exf_interp_read

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Dimitris & Martin,

Thanks for pointing this inconsistency and also for the suggestion.
(in fact, did not know what bufferSize to use, a vague idea about 
fitting a 2x2 field, but forgot to change the value I took from
global_with_exf/code/exf_interp_read.F ...).
I am going to set it to 80000 so that a 1x1 deg field will fit.

But since the previous version (with dynamic allocation) was 
working well (except may be for multi-threaded), I made
#define EXF_INTERP_USE_DYNALLOC
the default in pkg/exf/EXF_OPTIONS.h

Is it OK like this ?

Thanks,
Jean-Michel

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:50:22PM -0700, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
> >wouldn't it make sense to set the default really to 20000 (as promised in 
> >the comment) which is larger than 192x94=18048 (the "standard" size of 
> >ncep/core fields that we use for the cs510 for example)?
> >
> >Plus with the fields that I downloaded from Dimitiris, I have a runoff 
> >file which is 360x180 = 64800.
> >I am not happy about having a local copy of EXF_PARAMS.h in every single 
> >experiment that uses EXF_USE_INTERPOLATION. How do you feel about this? 
> >Couldn't we have a better default (more like 64800)?
> 
> The ERA40/ECMWF fields that Patrick and I are starting to use are 320x160.  
> So 64800 would cover ERA40/ECMWF input but not 20000
> .
> 
> D.
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel