[MITgcm-devel] exf_interp_read
Dimitris Menemenlis
menemenlis at sbcglobal.net
Fri May 11 16:50:22 EDT 2007
> wouldn't it make sense to set the default really to 20000 (as promised in the comment) which is larger than 192x94=18048 (the "standard" size of ncep/core fields that we use for the cs510 for example)?
>
> Plus with the fields that I downloaded from Dimitiris, I have a runoff file which is 360x180 = 64800.
> I am not happy about having a local copy of EXF_PARAMS.h in every single experiment that uses EXF_USE_INTERPOLATION. How do you feel about this? Couldn't we have a better default (more like 64800)?
The ERA40/ECMWF fields that Patrick and I are starting to use are 320x160. So
64800 would cover ERA40/ECMWF input but not 20000
.
D.
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list