[MITgcm-devel] rdmnc.m or mnc ?

[Martin Losch]

Looks good.

Martin
On 19 Feb 2007, at 04:57, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Martin,
>
> I changed rdmnc.m, removing thoses 2 lines,
> and trying to make it to work with output files from a Y-Z set up
> (X dim = 1).
> Can you check that it is still working for you ?
> Thanks,
> Jean-Michel
>
>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:21:21PM +0100, Martin Losch wrote:
>>> Me again:
>>> I would actually think that the two lines
>>>>            if ismember('Zd000001' ,dims), adj = adj - 1; end
>>>>            if ismember('Zmd000001',dims), adj = adj - 1; end
>>> are not really necessary (they are the ones that tailor rdmnc to the
>>> diagnostics package). Without these lines the output of a 2d
>>> diagnostics field has the shape [nx ny 1 nt]. What's wrong with  
>>> that?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 18 Feb 2007, at 21:02, Martin Losch wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jean-Michel,
>>>>
>>>> sorry for creating this problem. I am so unfamiliar with the
>>>> diagnostics package, that I didn't even think about it. Please feel
>>>> free to revert to revision 1.10. Alternatively I can try to make
>>>> rdmnc work with both types of fields: [nx 1 nz nt], and [nx ny 1
>>>> nt]. There has got to be a way to make this work.
>>>>
>>>> I guess the 3rd dimension in 2d-diagnostics is necessary if you
>>>> write just one level of 3d field. In that case you would like to
>>>> know which level this is, right?
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> On 18 Feb 2007, at 01:25, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just added the cvs Header & Name,
>>>>> in all utils/matlab/*.m files.
>>>>> I don't update so often my matlab scripts, and when,
>>>>> after an update, something is broken, it's far much easier
>>>>> to identify which version was working and why it's broken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, regarding rdmnc.m,
>>>>> seems to me that Revision 1.11:
>>>>> "replace a squeeze() with a shiftdim() ..."
>>>>> is not compatible with Revision 1.6:
>>>>> "Fixed a bug relating to recognizing z coordinate singleton
>>>>> dimension"
>>>>>
>>>>> May be a way to fix this would be to change the mnc part of
>>>>> diagnostics_out.F, so that 2-D diagnostics are really treated as
>>>>> 2-D fields (without this 3rd dim Zd000001 or Zmd000001) ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jean-Michel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel