[MITgcm-devel] rdmnc.m or mnc ?

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Martin,

I changed rdmnc.m, removing thoses 2 lines,
and trying to make it to work with output files from a Y-Z set up 
(X dim = 1).
Can you check that it is still working for you ?
Thanks,
Jean-Michel

> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:21:21PM +0100, Martin Losch wrote:
> > Me again:
> > I would actually think that the two lines
> > >            if ismember('Zd000001' ,dims), adj = adj - 1; end
> > >            if ismember('Zmd000001',dims), adj = adj - 1; end
> > are not really necessary (they are the ones that tailor rdmnc to the  
> > diagnostics package). Without these lines the output of a 2d  
> > diagnostics field has the shape [nx ny 1 nt]. What's wrong with that?
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > On 18 Feb 2007, at 21:02, Martin Losch wrote:
> > 
> > >Hi Jean-Michel,
> > >
> > >sorry for creating this problem. I am so unfamiliar with the  
> > >diagnostics package, that I didn't even think about it. Please feel  
> > >free to revert to revision 1.10. Alternatively I can try to make  
> > >rdmnc work with both types of fields: [nx 1 nz nt], and [nx ny 1  
> > >nt]. There has got to be a way to make this work.
> > >
> > >I guess the 3rd dimension in 2d-diagnostics is necessary if you  
> > >write just one level of 3d field. In that case you would like to  
> > >know which level this is, right?
> > >
> > >Martin
> > >
> > >On 18 Feb 2007, at 01:25, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>I've just added the cvs Header & Name,
> > >>in all utils/matlab/*.m files.
> > >>I don't update so often my matlab scripts, and when,
> > >>after an update, something is broken, it's far much easier
> > >>to identify which version was working and why it's broken.
> > >>
> > >>Now, regarding rdmnc.m,
> > >>seems to me that Revision 1.11:
> > >>"replace a squeeze() with a shiftdim() ..."
> > >>is not compatible with Revision 1.6:
> > >>"Fixed a bug relating to recognizing z coordinate singleton  
> > >>dimension"
> > >>
> > >>May be a way to fix this would be to change the mnc part of
> > >>diagnostics_out.F, so that 2-D diagnostics are really treated as
> > >>2-D fields (without this 3rd dim Zd000001 or Zmd000001) ?
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>Jean-Michel
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > >>MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > >>http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > >MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > >http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel