[MITgcm-devel] depressed Eta and sIceLoad
Martin Losch
mlosch at awi-bremerhaven.de
Tue Oct 24 08:20:35 EDT 2006
Dimitris,
I really think that this will also get rid of your problems in the
Weddell Sea. As far as I remember you had the problem of too much
convection, erorsion of stratification and consequently too little
seaice towards the end of your 10-12year integration. It appears to
me that EVAP is the culprit, not KPP or missing shelfice water. With
this bug I had -1.9 all the way to the bottom around Antarctic
already after 10-20years. After correction of the bug, the
stratification remains stable for 100year (I haven't run it any
longer), without any restoring SST/SSS to Levitus.
I still have a problem with seaice though, and that's the snow. Far
too much snow (100m) that even remains, when the seaice is gone in
summer. I use all the default parameters.
Is it a problem that snow is not advected along with ice?
One could think of a simple flooding algorithm that converts
submerged snow into ice:
hDraft = (HSNOW(I,J,bi,bj)*330. _d 0
& +HEFF(I,J,1,bi,bj)*SEAICE_rhoIce)/1000. _d 0
hFlood = hDraft - MIN(hDraft,HEFF(I,J,1,bi,bj))
HEFF(I,J,1,bi,bj) = HEFF(I,J,1,bi,bj) + hFlood
HSNOW(I,J,bi,bj) = MAX(0. _d 0,HSNOW(I,J,bi,bj)-hFlood/SDF)
Martin
On 23 Oct 2006, at 18:50, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
> Martin, that's brilliant! EVAP, as it is computed right now,
> should definitely be weighted by (ONE-AREA(I,J,2,bi,bj)), that is,
> set to zero under sea ice. I agree, I think this is a bug. Can't
> wait to give it a try in the 18-km cube. Cheers, Dimitris
>
> --
> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
> tel: 818-354-1656; fax: 818-393-6720
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list