[MITgcm-devel] makedepend, again

[Martin Losch]

Hi Ed,

I had to change the position of RV1=$? to make it work. I moved it up 
to lines so that RV1 holds the status of 'makedepend genmake_tc.f', 
which is was supposed to do. I am pretty sure that this is the way it 
is supposed to be, but please check.

Martin

On Mar 9, 2005, at 8:58 PM, Ed Hill wrote:

>
> Hi Marin,
>
> OK, so some makedepend implementatons will fail if no "Makefile" is
> present.  Annoying, but certainly not a show-stopper.
>
>
>> Then  I run "make makefile", I don't get these messages again and I
>> have MAKEDEPEND=makedepend in Makefile.
>
> The above is a perfectly good solution.
>
>
>> I know now how to deal with this, but can genmake2 be generalized to
>> get rid off this problem?
>
> Yes, and I've just checked in some logic for this case.  Please give it
> a try and let me know whether it works or not since I can't access that
> machine.
>
> Ed
>
> -- 
> Edward H. Hill III, PhD
> office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
>              Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
> emails:  eh3 at mit.edu                ed at eh3.com
> URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
> phone:   617-253-0098
> fax:     617-253-4464
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel