[MITgcm-devel] negative diagnostics freq

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

My vote is "not" to touch the time-averaged time stamp, leave it at the 
end of the period, as it is right now.  This is where it has been since 
MITgcm-time immemorial.  It would create immense grief and confusion if 
this admittedly-not-ideal convention were to be changed now.

But, can I go ahead and fix the snapshot timestamp.  It's needlessly 
confusing as it stands right now and contrary to every other dumpfreq 
and tavefreq convention in the code.

D.

-- 
Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
tel: 818-354-1656;  fax: 818-393-6720