[MITgcm-devel] initialisation and mnc

[Ed Hill]

On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 22:37, Patrick Heimbach wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> indeed, probably one of the main reasons for having
> a pkg_init_fixed.F and a pkg_init_varia.F
> is to put all non-AD relevant (fixed) stuff in the
> former and easily hide it from TAF.
> Array initialisations are active and would be in 
> pkg_init_varia.F
> So I'd agree with both Jean-Michel's points.


Hi Jean-Michel & Patrick,

OK, good points -- I'll re-arrange the subroutine calls 
this weekend.

And I'll also fix the mnc output in mom_vecinv() which is 
currently incorrect as JMC pointed out late today.

Ed

ps - Please stop cc:-ing me when you send emails to the 
  MITgcm-* lists.  I'm subscribed to all of them and I 
  read *every* email so theres no need for duplicates!

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 at mit.edu                ed at eh3.com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464