[MITgcm-devel] useMNC

[Chris Hill]

eedata sounds good, but we should try and stick to just two places where
"useXXX" flags can go if possible. 

can we create a stable checkpoint after this?

chris 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org 
> [mailto:mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of Alistair Adcroft
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:59 AM
> To: MITgcm Developers
> Subject: [MITgcm-devel] useMNC
> 
> Currently the flag useMNC=.TRUE. is in data.mnc which is a 
> little conflicted.
> 
> We can't put the line in data.packages because of the 
> initialization order - is that correct?
> 
> Are we agreed that this can (and should) go in eedata? I've 
> created a useMDSIO that will go there too. Any other 
> environment-package flags that should go there?
> 
> Object now or forever hold your peace.
> 
> A.
> --
> Dr Alistair Adcroft            http://www.mit.edu/~adcroft
> MIT Climate Modeling Initiative        tel: (617) 253-5938
> EAPS 54-1624,  77 Massachusetts Ave,  Cambridge,  MA,  USA
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>