[MITgcm-devel] more seaice

[Martin Losch]

Dimitris,

too late now, because I checked in the changes on Friday (o:

I don't like external_forcing_surf as the place where E-P should be 
masked. It's not apparent to the "uninitiated" user, why this should be 
done here, because surfaceTendencyS/T is masked anyway (at least by 
recip_hfacc). I guess it could be done at the time when E-P is dumped 
on the water column. On the other hand, it doesn't not make sense for 
the SEAICE model to produce E-P over land, does it? So I actually 
think, that masking it in growth (where E-P is computed) is not so bad 
after all. Mhmmm ... I would be interested in JMC's opinion.

Martin


On Saturday, May 1, 2004, at 06:04 AM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:

>> independently from all of the previous emails about seaice I would
>> like to make a suggestion for the seaice-package: I would like to
>> introduce masks (maskC) into the routine GROWTH for:
>
> Martin, if you haven't already gone ahead and implemented the masks,
> I wonder whether a better place for the masking would be in
> external_forcing_surf, instead of pkg/seaice, since the problem you
> have detected can also occur when files are read in by
> external_fields_load, the standard MIT GCM I/O routine.
>
> D.
>
> -- 
> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Insitute of Technology
> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
> tel: 818-354-1656;  fax: 818-393-6720
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel