[MITgcm-support] shelfice_thermodynamics.F crash
Martin Losch
martin.losch at awi.de
Fri Jan 23 01:42:48 EST 2026
I don’t know. If both solutions give the same results, I’d go with SHELFICE_USE_HEATBALANCE_FOR_FRESHWATERFLUX defined, as this is in compact form what is implemented in pkg/steep_icecavity. I have no experience with this version. The other option is a hack that just avoids the division by zero, this is only physically correct if sLoc is really zero at the same time.
M.
> On 22. Jan 2026, at 21:05, Dimitris Menemenlis <dimitris.menemenlis at sjsu.edu> wrote:
>
> Done. I left a review. Both options work.
> Which one do you recommend that Kayhan and I use?
> with or without SHELFICE_USE_HEATBALANCE_FOR_FRESHWATERFLUX defined?
>
> Thanks a million for super-quick turnaround on this request.
>
> D.
>
>
>> On Jan 22, 2026, at 4:58 AM, Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de> wrote:
>>
>> Please have a look at PR #968
>> https://github.com/MITgcm/MITgcm/pull/968
>>
>> @Dimitry, it would be great, if you could try this code in your little test, and also review it in github.
>>
>> M
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20260123/648a96df/attachment.html>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list