From rajesh70530 at gmail.com Tue Apr 7 01:43:19 2026 From: rajesh70530 at gmail.com (Killampalli Rajesh) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:13:19 +0530 Subject: [MITgcm-support] How to restore the surface currents for accurate simulation of submisoscale eddies. Message-ID: Dear MITgcm Support Team, I am running a regional MITgcm simulation (~3 km resolution) with time-varying GLORYS boundary conditions (U, V, T, S, SSH). I observe bias in surface currents (magnitude and direction), and mesoscale/submesoscale eddies are not well captured in the interannual simulations. I initially considered applying relaxation (nudging) the SST and SSS (e.g., via climatological relaxation or using boundary-driven constraints in data.obcs). However, I understand that this not improving in the surface currents. I am considering whether surface current nudging (similar to SST/SSS) is possible or advisable. Specifically: - Can pkg/ctrl be used to weakly/daily constrain surface currents or SSH? - Is there any recommended approach to improve surface currents without suppressing eddies? Any guidance would be appreciated. Kind regards ``````````````````````````````````````````````` Killampalli Rajesh (Research Scholar) Centre For Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Hauz Khas, New Delhi - 110016 O-Email: asz238484 at iitd.ac.in P-Email: rajesh70530 at gmail.com Phone: +91 9492068095. ``````````````````````````````````````````````` -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Martin.Losch at awi.de Tue Apr 7 06:05:36 2026 From: Martin.Losch at awi.de (Martin Losch) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 12:05:36 +0200 Subject: [MITgcm-support] How to restore the surface currents for accurate simulation of submisoscale eddies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7102EB37-9B63-40F3-8A80-89B593A95013@awi.de> Hi Killampalli, you can use pkg/rbcs for that, there?s even some documentation: https://mitgcm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/phys_pkgs/rbcs.html pkg/ctrl cannot be used for restoring. Martin > On 7. Apr 2026, at 07:43, Killampalli Rajesh wrote: > > Dear MITgcm Support Team, > > I am running a regional MITgcm simulation (~3 km resolution) with time-varying GLORYS boundary conditions (U, V, T, S, SSH). I observe bias in surface currents (magnitude and direction), and mesoscale/submesoscale eddies are not well captured in the interannual simulations. > > I initially considered applying relaxation (nudging) the SST and SSS (e.g., via climatological relaxation or using boundary-driven constraints in data.obcs). However, I understand that this not improving in the surface currents. > > I am considering whether surface current nudging (similar to SST/SSS) is possible or advisable. Specifically: > > Can pkg/ctrl be used to weakly/daily constrain surface currents or SSH? > Is there any recommended approach to improve surface currents without suppressing eddies? > Any guidance would be appreciated. > > Kind regards > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````` > > Killampalli Rajesh (Research Scholar) > > Centre For Atmospheric Sciences, > > Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi > > Hauz Khas, New Delhi - 110016 > > O-Email: asz238484 at iitd.ac.in > > P-Email: rajesh70530 at gmail.com > Phone: +91 9492068095. > > ``````````````````````````````````````````````` > _______________________________________________ > MITgcm-support mailing list > MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org > http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: