[MITgcm-support] unrealistic model results in a regional model

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

Hi FL, I have not followed this discussion (and perhaps Martin or Matt have already suggested/check this) but one place to look is your data.exf file.  Did you correctly specify the contents of your ERA5_sw_3hrs_1993.bin file? If you send (or resend?) your data.cal and data.exf files, I can take a quick look.

D.


> On Dec 15, 2025, at 6:59 AM, Martin Losch <Martin.Losch at awi.de> wrote:
> 
> again, I don’t know what to suggest, with your parameter settings you should get time dependent forcing. Run the model with a higher debugLevel > 3 and try to figure out from the STDOUT, what’s going on. 
> 
> After that there’s always the “print hallo” debugger (o:
> 
> Martin
> 
>> On 15. Dec 2025, at 11:43, Fanglou Liao <fanglou.liao at unswalumni.com <mailto:fanglou.liao at unswalumni.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Martin
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for your reply. I made a mistake in my previous email, actually EXFatemp diagnostics also remains unchanged with time, so the model actually reads only the first record of my external forcing. It is because EXFlwqnet is calculated with seawater temperature which varies, so the EXFlwqnet is changing. I really do not know why the model only reads the first record of my forcing file. I tested the forcing file in matlab as follows:
>> aaa = rdslice('ERA5_sw_3hrs_1993.bin',[77 57 2183],1,'real*4');
>> plot(squeeze(aaa(10,20,:))) ; the plot (attached) shows clearly the sw stored in my forcing file is changing.
>> Best,
>> FL

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20251215/ad725899/attachment.html>