[MITgcm-support] Diagnostic "Um_Advec"

[David Ferreira]

Hi all,

I’m trying to use the diagnostic Um_Advec/ Vm_Advec, and they don’t seem to give what I was expecting.
(Um_dPhiX/Y, Um_Cori/ Vm_Cori, Um_hDis2/ Vm_hDis2 seem fine).

A quick look at mom_vecinv.F where Um_Advec is filled suggests this is not going to work for all options (I think that with NHmetric, Um_Advec is filled with the Coriolis term). In fact, this diagnostic may only make sense with the mom flux form.
So, I wonder if someone has any quick insight in this before I start banging my head against this.

Cheers,
David




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20250424/05ad9708/attachment.html>