[MITgcm-support] Query regarding BLING

Matthew Mazloff mmazloff at ucsd.edu
Mon Sep 25 10:04:44 EDT 2023


Hi Kunal

The default bling chemistry is the same as the DIC package. Is your run with the funny behavior using 
#undef CARBONCHEM_SOLVESAPHE
If so, can you check that you get the desired outcome with this undefined.

There may be a bug in the BLING SOLVESAPHE code.

Matt



> On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:58 AM, kunal madkaiker <kunal.madkaiker02 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have some issues resolving the carbon chemistry using the BLING package. My domain has river runoff included as a point source. When using the 'DIC' package, DIC and ALK conc. get diluted causing pH to increase at those points (which is correct).
> 
> However, when I use the same setup with the BLING package, the DIC and ALK conc. are getting diluted but the pH decreases rapidly (5-6 pH).
> 
> Secondly, has the SOLVESAPHE algorithm been fully implemented in BLING or not yet? I tried defining 'CARBONCHEM_SOLVESAPHE' in BLING_OPTIONS.h and 'selectpHsolver=1' in data.bling but then I got the segmentation error. Otherwise, it works fine.
> 
> Let me know what you think. I am attaching the required files and plots for your reference.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kunal
> <BLING_OPTIONS.h><DIC_OPTIONS.h><data.dic><data.bling><sterr_file><using_bling.gif><using_dic.gif>_______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support__;!!Mih3wA!DU6XPS0r_V-iBbpy1DoUX0ePkKRdvMrbR61lSsmKcyG9Zzh1h9aJz2ECIYMYIci2i2Dseq_pUBQUpbrrkaBMwp8yzH-6$ 



More information about the MITgcm-support mailing list