[MITgcm-support] [EXTERNAL] Regarding MITgcm biogeochemical packages

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

Hi Kunal, BLING is a very good option, especially if you plan on using the adjoint model.

But there does exist a checked-in, more up-to-date, intermediate-complexity set-up of ECCO-Darwin that uses Oliver’s latest code:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019MS001888 <https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019MS001888>
https://github.com/MITgcm-contrib/ecco_darwin/tree/master/v05/llc270 <https://github.com/MITgcm-contrib/ecco_darwin/tree/master/v05/llc270>

Cheers, Dimitris


> On Apr 10, 2021, at 10:27 PM, kunal madkaiker <kunal.madkaiker02 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you Matt and Oliver,
> 
> I was actually looking for darwin llc_90 and cs_510 configuration setup and came to know
> that both used the GUD package. Thus, the question.
> 
> I want to simulate both carbon cycle as well as biology, which I have started by using the 
> DIC package. 
> 
> As Matt suggested, I think BLING  would be the preferred option if I am looking for 
> biology with intermediate level of complexity.
> 
> Regards
> -Kunal
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-support mailing list
> MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!dkHdZR9S5Pf7TTjbnX9nCASet7fCazJ9aOqb_s7cLJS2cDpWk7yuFl3e092SVVGlrFed7Le_haI$ 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20210411/22facf91/attachment.html>