[MITgcm-support] 转发: The obvious difference between ERA5 and NCEP-R1 forcing

[Leming Van]

Hi, everyone

Recently I tried to change forcing dataset from NCEP-R1(6-hourly) to ERA5(hourly), but the results of them look so different. I compared the results of NCEP-R1 with the reanalysis data of HYCOM, and these two data look similar.

Did I pick the wrong variables from ERA5? Or does this mean that higher temporal and spatial resolution atmospheric forcing ERA5 results in worse simulation results than lower resolution NCEP-R1?

I put the results at here, https://1drv.ms/u/s!AoS5GLJhmvDtjB5Ovnz63FidKeMo?e=c2hS7z
Suggestions are welcome.


-Mike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20200315/763f1574/attachment.html>