[MITgcm-support] Solution blows up
Shevchenko, Igor
i.shevchenko at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Mar 4 11:55:36 EST 2020
Hi Jody,
Thank you very much for your answer.
Attached is STDOUT.0000 . Does the CFL look suspicious?
Best regards,
Igor
________________________________________
From: MITgcm-support <mitgcm-support-bounces at mitgcm.org> on behalf of Jody Klymak <jklymak at uvic.ca>
Sent: 04 March 2020 16:44
To: mitgcm-support at mitgcm.org
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-support] Solution blows up
*******************
This email originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender.
If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx to disable email stamping for this address.
*******************
Hi Igor,
1. you could have density overturns in the interpolated field, and those will manifest as high vertical velocities that violate the CFL criterion.
2. you likely have some fast adjustment that is violating CFL and may need to use a smaller timestep for a little while until the model adjusts.
The fact you tried “different time steps” says that maybe the problem is more complicated, but it would be good to look at STDOUT.0000 and see what the cfl criterion is saying.
Cheers, Jody
--
Jody Klymak
http://web.uvic.ca/~jklymak/
_______________________________________________
MITgcm-support mailing list
MITgcm-support at mitgcm.org
http://mailman.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-support
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: STDOUT.0000
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 156922 bytes
Desc: STDOUT.0000
URL: <http://mailman.mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-support/attachments/20200304/50bdb91b/attachment-0001.obj>
More information about the MITgcm-support
mailing list